RTI Requests

Annexure “c”

[See rule 5(2)]

Second Appeal under section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005

From,

Ashok S. Verma

(Social & RTI Activist)

G-2 Green Park, Vartak College Road,

Shastri Nagar, Vasai Road (w),

Dist Thane, Maharashtra,401202, India

Telephone No. 0250-2341000/2000/3263000

Fax No. 0250- 2345000

 

To :

The Second Appellate authority

Chief information Commissioner ,

 State Information commission, Maharashtra State,

New Administrative Building 1^st Floor, Mantralay , Mumbai-400032

 

 

 

(1)    Full name of the Appellant : Ashok  Verma

 

 

(2)    Address :                               G-2 Green Park, Vartak College Road,

Shastri Nagar, Vasai Road (w),

Dist. Thane, Maharashtra,401202, India

 

 

(3)    Particulars of the State Public Information Officer:     I. Public Information Officer

Information Officer under Right To

information Act.  And Assistant Police

Commissioner (Crime), Office of the

police commissioner , Mumbai

Maharashtra .

                                                                       

II. Public Information Officer,

Under Right to Information Act.

And Deputy Asst. (Crime)

Office of the Director General Of

Maharashtra, Mumbai 400001

 

 

 

 

(4)    Particulars of the First Appellate Authority :        The Appellate Authority

Under Right to Information Act.

& Dy. Commissioner of police ( Preventive)

Shiva jee Mandai, Office of the

Commissioner of Police ,

Mumbai, Maharashtra,40001.

 

 

 

(5)    Date of receipt of the order appealed against : 02/03/2011 at 12.30 pm

 

 

(6)    Last date for filling the appeal : 01/06/2011

 

 

(7)    The grounds for appeal :   Appellate authority fail to record my objection that

Information officer can not raise fresh issue in appeal and

instead of giving legal and valid order he tried to save his

departmental  Juniors and allowed him to misuse of R.T.I. act.

And he has also not applied his mind that information officer

is raising fresh issue (that department do not have information

as per application)  after thought as much as after filling my

appeal.  When information officer wide his letter dated

01/02/2011 has informed appellant that they can not provide as

per sec 8(1) (Chh) & 8 (1)J this means the are having

information and deliberately not disclosing it

in order to save illegal activity of his corrupt I.P.S. Boss. And

also not  imposed fine to Information Officer for delayed

information as per my  application dated 16/11/2011 .

 

 

(8)    Particulars of information-

 

 

(i)                 Nature and subject matter of the

Information required :                      (2) How many officers were sent to bring

Chhota  Rajan when he was attacked

at Thailand  along with name with

Ranks & when (Period), with detail

expenditure occurred during visit &

date when Chhota  Rajan Flew Away ?

 

 

(ii)               Name of the Office or Department to Which

the information relates :                           Public Information Officer and

Assistant Police Commissioner

(Crime), Office of the police

Commissioner , Mumbai

Maharashtra .

 

 

(9)     Prayer  :                                          Order of appellate authority  may be set aside and

Information May be provided as per

Application dated 16/11/2010 (attached

Herewith)  and Penalty may be imposed on

Both the information Officer for delay as per

Right to information Act. As well as Order

Passed By  Hon’ble  Delhi High Court in this

Regards.  And cost of appeal may be awarded to the

Appellant.

 

                                                                                        Appellant

                          

Place: – Vasai   Road                                                     Ashok S. Verma

G-2, Green Park, Vatic Collage Road,

Date:-03/03/2011                                           Shastri Nagar, Vasai Road (West),

Dist. Thane, Maharashtra, 401202, India